Talk:Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror

NOT 'in production'

Untitled

I removed the line saying the film is in production. It is still in re-writes and has not even begun pre-production.

Criticism

"Despite the fact that the USS Nautilus (SSN577) is permanently based in Groton, Ct. as a museum and is incapable of use as a submarine, the vessel plays a minor role in the story."

Riiiight, and that just ruined it for you, did it? How about this:

Despite the fact that C. Megaladon is extinct, the author uses it as the basis for his book.

You do know it's called FICTION for a reason, right? Do you watch Star Trek and get all hung up about the fact that they're going faster than light or that there are aliens who look pretty much like humans but with bumpy foreheads? If so you must lead a very frustrating life.

To this end, I am REMOVING the criticism section. If your life is so terribly incomplete without it, revert the edit, but I stand by it. Literary criticism requires a real critique of the story, not just of arbitrary bits which don't reflect reality. Bwanderson (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The title is Meg...

... not "Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror" - is it so hard to differ title and tagline? --84.44.179.39 (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Under "Film": Clarification and Source Added

There was misinformation and speculation posted in this entry under "Film" and I found the proper source and edited the small sentence slightly to refer the accurate information. Obviously, nobody caught this error so I did some searching and corrected the information along with the source to the website/article reporting the information. 2001:558:6007:98:446C:DE4E:E835:F496 (talk) 03:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have done my best to clean up, but this article is clearly in need of some work, even a rewrite. Help from someone who has read the book would be greatly appreciated! -BassoProfundo 18:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 18:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 23:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081031140521/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/12422 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/12422

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)